›

Desperate Riker

A Traveling Man [Cymru Am Byth]A Traveling Man [Cymru Am Byth] ✭✭
in The Bridge
Just how is his ship ability NOT named "We Won't Go Back!"??

He also looks a little too well put together! Look at that styled hair and beard! And just a couple of smudges on the uniform? I guess even when overwhelmed by the Borg, Starfleet Captains must always strive to look their best...
Fleet Cymru am Byth is recruiting!

Comments

  • GhostStalkerGhostStalker ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited June 14
    You're right, my first thought was "he looks a lot cleaner than I remember."

    I think its that the hair and beard in the artwork look clean, coiffed and gelled.

    x5d2wbkc732d.jpg
  • A Traveling Man [Cymru Am Byth]A Traveling Man [Cymru Am Byth] ✭✭
    I've been hoping for the Desperate Riker for a long time. I really wanted the crazy space hobo. So sad we didn't get it!

    Creepy beardless plays-with-his-joystick Riker might rival Angel 1 Riker for inappropriateness....
    Fleet Cymru am Byth is recruiting!
  • FlemmingFlemming ✭✭✭✭✭
    Or we need a Recovering Riker:
    013jpfkszaxc.png
    Intentionally Left Blank
  • Captain QCaptain Q ✭✭✭
    A Traveling Man [Cymru Am Byth] wrote: »
    He also looks a little too well put together! Look at that styled hair and beard! And just a couple of smudges on the uniform? I guess even when overwhelmed by the Borg, Starfleet Captains must always strive to look their best...

    Blame it on Hipster Spock for setting the precedence! It's an alpha battle and Riker's gotta go for the nouveau Hipster Lumberjack Riker look...

    B)
    In the immortal words of Spock: "Live long and prosper"
  • (CSF) Jesus Is Lord [••••](CSF) Jesus Is Lord [••••] ✭✭✭✭✭
    Flemming wrote: »
    Or we need a Recovering Riker:
    013jpfkszaxc.png

    Man I liked that show!!!
  • FlemmingFlemming ✭✭✭✭✭
    (CSF) Jesus Is Lord [••••] wrote: »
    Flemming wrote: »
    Or we need a Recovering Riker:
    013jpfkszaxc.png

    Man I liked that show!!!

    And the Frakes episodes were some of the better ones in my opinion.
    Intentionally Left Blank
  • GhostStalkerGhostStalker ✭✭✭✭✭
  • SoupKitchen RikerSoupKitchen Riker ✭✭✭✭
    edited June 15
    "Smooth as an Android's Bottom" Riker is a need, just like "4 Lights" Picard.
    “A committee is a cul-de-sac, down which good ideas are lured and quietly strangled.”
    —Mark Twain

    MEMBER: [BoB] Barrel of Bloodwine... We are Recruiting

    Best Event Finish: #7 during Rule 125 Rerun

    667 Immortalized (Not Counting Duplicates)

    Honor Debt: Inconceivable, but maybe DB will take a personal check?
  • DaystromDaystrom ✭
    My question is, what's with the jazz hands? The artist really captured the look of fear, but I don't get the hands.
  • Zann CalcoreZann Calcore ✭✭✭✭
    They’re always screwing up ship abilities’ names. Klingon Janeway currently has hers titled as “Power is Not Enough”. It should be “I’m No One’s Prey!”, but of course, they screwed it up. It’s so weird to me how they can get so many idiosyncrasies right and then get some really blatant, obvious adjustments totally and utterly wrong. I’m certain that most of the people that put these crew together don’t actually watch the episodes or movies they’re from specifically because of things like this.

    Honestly, they should have a dedicated member of the crew building team whose entire job is making sure the characters are accurate in appearance and with ship abilities’ titles. His/her whole purpose would be to rewatch episodes and movie and make sure they don’t make minor screw-ups like this and Klingon Janeway and others.
    Weirdly enough, I’m also Vulcan Housewife. Also, RNGesus hates me, like really, REALLY hates me.
  • Dirk GundersonDirk Gunderson ✭✭✭✭✭
    Zann Calcore wrote: »
    They’re always screwing up ship abilities’ names. Klingon Janeway currently has hers titled as “Power is Not Enough”. It should be “I’m No One’s Prey!”, but of course, they screwed it up. It’s so weird to me how they can get so many idiosyncrasies right and then get some really blatant, obvious adjustments totally and utterly wrong. I’m certain that most of the people that put these crew together don’t actually watch the episodes or movies they’re from specifically because of things like this.

    Honestly, they should have a dedicated member of the crew building team whose entire job is making sure the characters are accurate in appearance and with ship abilities’ titles. His/her whole purpose would be to rewatch episodes and movie and make sure they don’t make minor screw-ups like this and Klingon Janeway and others.

    I’d think it would be more cost-effective if DB just used their player base of borderline-OCD Trekkies to help with that. I get why they don’t usually take action for our trait audits since there are game balance issues that come into play; however, for things like quotes and descriptions, they already have a great team of fact-checkers...us.
  • ~peregrine~~peregrine~ ✭✭✭✭✭
    Dirk Gunderson wrote: »
    Zann Calcore wrote: »
    They’re always screwing up ship abilities’ names. Klingon Janeway currently has hers titled as “Power is Not Enough”. It should be “I’m No One’s Prey!”, but of course, they screwed it up. It’s so weird to me how they can get so many idiosyncrasies right and then get some really blatant, obvious adjustments totally and utterly wrong. I’m certain that most of the people that put these crew together don’t actually watch the episodes or movies they’re from specifically because of things like this.

    Honestly, they should have a dedicated member of the crew building team whose entire job is making sure the characters are accurate in appearance and with ship abilities’ titles. His/her whole purpose would be to rewatch episodes and movie and make sure they don’t make minor screw-ups like this and Klingon Janeway and others.

    I’d think it would be more cost-effective if DB just used their player base of borderline-OCD Trekkies to help with that. I get why they don’t usually take action for our trait audits since there are game balance issues that come into play; however, for things like quotes and descriptions, they already have a great team of fact-checkers...us.

    +76
    "In the short run, the game defines the players. But in the long run, it's us players who define the game." -- Nicky Case, The Evolution of Trust
Sign In or Register to comment.